Minutes of the 6th Yokohama City Public University Corporation Evaluation Committee

●Date and time: From Wednesday, April 12, 2006 from 15:00 to 16:15
●Location: First meeting room on the 4th floor of City University Hospital
●Attendees: Mr. Kawamura, Iida, Kishi, Yamagami, Yonemoto
●Organized form: Published
●As soon as possible (PDF: 80KB)
●Proceedings
（１） About the proceedings of the 5th Yokohama City Public University Corporation Evaluation Committee (draft)
[Document 1] (PDF: 94KB) explained by the secretariat and was approved.
＊Major exchange of opinions, etc.
Nothing in particular

（２） About the way of thinking and how to proceed (revised amendment) of Yokohama City Public University Corporation Evaluation Committee
[Document 2] (PDF: 493KB) (Reference 1 to 4), the secretariat provided an explanation, and the original draft was partially revised and approved.
＊Major exchange of opinions, etc.
・If the evaluation items are set to 11 items, one item may be too large to evaluate.
・I would like the corporation to report to some extent in detail.
・There may be a number of items as described in the table of contents in the annual plan.
・When evaluating as objectively as possible, it should be divided into some items and comprehensively judgement.
・The process from the self-evaluation submitted by the corporation to the evaluation results performed by the Corporate Evaluation Committee must be shown in a way that can be understood.
・How do the evaluation results for each fiscal year relate to the medium-term plan? Also, what is your position in the overall medium-term plan?
・If the evaluation items are too large, you do not know what to ask at the time of hearing.
・While implementing it for the time being, we will summarize it in the final form, including an explanation of the process.
・Regarding the evaluation items, there is also a method of giving out more detailed items, but it may be possible to have them submit them as reference materials as necessary and respond accordingly.
・It is also necessary to show that the medium-term targets are proceeding smoothly.
・Education and research is supposed to be conducted by a certification and evaluation organization, but isn't education and management one?
・It is important to check the progress of the plan through evaluations from A to D, and if C and D evaluations are given, a detailed description such as "Why could not be done?" In some cases, there may be a change in the plan.

（３） Others
[Document 3] (PDF: 164KB), the public university corporation Yokohama City University Secretariat explained the progress of efforts so far in the annual plan.
＊Major exchange of opinions, etc.
・You may be aware of the medium-term plan. In about the third year, the plan and actual results may differ.
・How is the way of graduate school being discussed?
・Are the materials of the plan for FY2018 show the essence?
・Have you started the audit in fiscal 2005? It is very difficult for an auditor to do this kind of organization.