Minutes of the 4th Yokohama City Public University Corporation Evaluation Committee

• Date and time Thursday, September 1, 2005 From 15:00 to 16:10
• Place City University Exchange Plaza (Ichonokan)
• Attendees Mr. Kawamura, Mr. Iida, Mr. Kishi, Mr. Yamagami, Mr. Yonemoto
• Open form (no observer)
• (PDF: 81KB)
• Proceedings

（１） Yokohama City Public University Corporation Evaluation Committee (1st, 2nd, 3rd) Minutes (draft)
[Document 1] (PDF: 80KB) provided an explanation from the secretariat, and the contents of the exchange of opinions were also posted.
In addition, it was decided to leave the contents to the chairperson.
*Main exchange of opinions, etc.
・As a summary, it is better to describe the contents a little more.
・It is better to be able to understand some of the interactions about the proceedings.
（２） About the concept of evaluation of the Yokohama City Public University Corporation Evaluation Committee and how to proceed (draft)
[Document 2] (PDF: 380KB) provided an explanation from the secretariat, and each committee member exchanged opinions.
*Main exchange of opinions, etc.
・Due to the large number of items for evaluation, it is difficult to evaluate quantitatively and objectively.
・At the end of the fiscal year, it is feared that it is difficult to properly evaluate a large number of reports in detail in a short period of time, so we would like the corporation to report the progress of the business at any time during the fiscal year and grasp the situation.
・The role of the Evaluation Committee is that the basic policy calls for improvement as necessary, but if the Evaluation Committee goes too far, it may be too much.
・Internal audits are conducted by auditors and accounting auditors inside the university, but I think the results of each audit will be referenced.
・In the evaluation table of the reference example, is the committee evaluated individually for the contents of the self-evaluation and special notes described by the corporation, or is the committee evaluated?
・Regarding what kind of perspective the evaluation will be conducted, I think it is good to evaluate from the viewpoint of how to help the voluntary improvement of the corporation, and then have it improved if necessary.
・It is difficult to understand the relationship and role between external evaluations such as certification evaluation institutions and hospital function evaluations and evaluations by the Corporate Evaluation Committee.
・It is not just a matter of increasing the number of applicants, but it is necessary to evaluate from the perspective of how responses are being made to the diversifying quality of students.
・The university will assign ABCD as a self-evaluation, but I would like you to state why.
・External evaluations at the hospital will be conducted at the hospital next year and at the center hospital two years later, but the contents of the evaluation of the hospital have been quite detailed, so it is expected that self-evaluation and external organization evaluation will overlap considerably. It seems.
・The evaluation of education and research seems to be the main focus, but in private schools, it seems that the management is also deeply evaluated, and I think it is necessary to evaluate financial relations.